Forum Moderation Policy (Rules)

Post by **phelix** » Sat Jun 28, 2014 10:36 am

LOL, I wish any of my other posts would get so much agreement

By forum consensus the rules are active.

virtual_master · Post by **virtual_master** » Fri Nov 28, 2014 1:07 pm

The rules sounds reasonable,

Post by **phelix** » Fri Jan 02, 2015 11:06 am

New rule:

Moderators must not moderate disputes they are involved in.

New moderators: biolizard89, cassini, domob, indolering

May the force be with you.

Post by **phelix** » Tue Jan 13, 2015 2:45 pm

"You may embed only 3 quotes within each other." got on my nerves so set "Maximum nested quotes per post" to unlimited.

indolering · Post by **indolering** » Thu Jan 15, 2015 6:51 pm

Here's a couple more:

Moderators don't directly moderate threads in which they are involved, ask another mod to weigh in (i.e. moderating your own drama causes more drama).
No trading.

Post by **phelix** » Thu Jan 15, 2015 8:01 pm

indolering wrote:Here's a couple more:

Moderators don't directly moderate threads in which they are involved, ask another mod to weigh in (i.e. moderating your own drama causes more drama).

No trading.

I think the first suggestion is the last point on the list already.

What do you mean by "no trading"? There is a marketplace board after all...

indolering · Post by **indolering** » Fri Jan 16, 2015 6:27 am

phelix wrote: I think the first suggestion is the last point on the list already.

Whoops, I missed that one!

phelix wrote: What do you mean by "no trading"? There is a marketplace board after all...

Oh, do we have any system of vetting?

Post by **biolizard89** » Fri Jan 16, 2015 6:16 pm

indolering wrote:
phelix wrote: I think the first suggestion is the last point on the list already.
Whoops, I missed that one!
phelix wrote: What do you mean by "no trading"? There is a marketplace board after all...
Oh, do we have any system of vetting?

I think right now it's "buyer must do due diligence themselves". I really wouldn't mind changing that or even removing some of those forum categories. We can discuss that at the #namecoin-dev meeting tomorrow if you like.

indolering · Post by **indolering** » Fri Jan 23, 2015 12:25 am

biolizard89 wrote:
phelix wrote: What do you mean by "no trading"? There is a marketplace board after all...

indolering wrote:Oh, do we have any system of vetting?
I think right now it's "buyer must do due diligence themselves". I really wouldn't mind changing that or even removing some of those forum categories. We can discuss that at the #namecoin-dev meeting tomorrow if you like.

On IRC, we send people to the Bitcoin IRC chat room because they have moderators and some level of vetting. If there is such a board on bitcointalk or elsewhere, I would prefer to send people there.

Post by **phelix** » Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:04 pm

Added:

Advertisements: Maximum of one post per month. (Must be related to Namecoin.)

Namecoin Forum

Forum Moderation Policy (Rules)

Re: Forum Moderation Policy (draft)

Re: Forum Moderation Policy (Rules)

Re: Forum Moderation Policy (Rules)

Re: Forum Moderation Policy (Rules)

Re: Forum Moderation Policy (Rules)

Re: Forum Moderation Policy (Rules)

Re: Forum Moderation Policy (Rules)

Re: Forum Moderation Policy (Rules)

Re: Forum Moderation Policy (Rules)

Re: Forum Moderation Policy (Rules)