Should we support P2SH in name operations? E.g.
[name operation] OP_HASH160 [hash] OP_EQUAL
P2SH for names would be good to have.
P2SH addresses
Re: P2SH addresses
Yes. The current Namecore code does precisely this, i. e., the IsPayToScriptHash check strips prefixes. I think this is what we want for Namecoin.ryanc wrote:Should we support P2SH in name operations? E.g.
[name operation] OP_HASH160 [hash] OP_EQUAL
P2SH for names would be good to have.
BTC: 1domobKsPZ5cWk2kXssD8p8ES1qffGUCm | NMC: NCdomobcmcmVdxC5yxMitojQ4tvAtv99pY
BM-GtQnWM3vcdorfqpKXsmfHQ4rVYPG5pKS
Use your Namecoin identity as OpenID: https://nameid.org/
BM-GtQnWM3vcdorfqpKXsmfHQ4rVYPG5pKS
Use your Namecoin identity as OpenID: https://nameid.org/
Re: P2SH addresses
The 6 prefix is used by BIP38 encrypted private keys. What about lower case s for the prefix?