What caused the dip in block rate in 2011?

Post Reply
Paul
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 10:37 pm

What caused the dip in block rate in 2011?

Post by Paul »

I was looking through some blockchain data and I noticed that from mid July to about mid October in 2011 Namecoin experienced a dip in the block creation rate. I have included some plots below. I am new to Namecoin, and I was wondering if anyone knows why this happened?

Image
Image

biolizard89
Posts: 2001
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 6:25 am
os: linux

Re: What caused the dip in block rate in 2011?

Post by biolizard89 »

I don't remember if this was at the time you refer to, but prior to merged mining being implemented, someone posted on BitcoinTalk announcing that given the Namecoin difficulty and exchange rate, it was more profitable to mine Namecoin than Bitcoin. All the miners quickly rushed to mine Namecoin until the next difficulty retarget, and then dropped it. As a result, Namecoin's difficulty was aritificially high, which caused a lot of Namecoin miners to quit until it returned to normal (which exacerbated the issue). At this time it would often take hours for transactions to confirm.

This is one of the major reasons why merged mining is so critical to a stable Namecoin blockchain.
Jeremy Rand, Lead Namecoin Application Engineer
NameID: id/jeremy
DyName: Dynamic DNS update client for .bit domains.

Donations: BTC 1EcUWRa9H6ZuWPkF3BDj6k4k1vCgv41ab8 ; NMC NFqbaS7ReiQ9MBmsowwcDSmp4iDznjmEh5

Paul
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 10:37 pm

Re: What caused the dip in block rate in 2011?

Post by Paul »

biolizard89 wrote:I don't remember if this was at the time you refer to, but prior to merged mining being implemented, someone posted on BitcoinTalk announcing that given the Namecoin difficulty and exchange rate, it was more profitable to mine Namecoin than Bitcoin. All the miners quickly rushed to mine Namecoin until the next difficulty retarget, and then dropped it. As a result, Namecoin's difficulty was aritificially high, which caused a lot of Namecoin miners to quit until it returned to normal (which exacerbated the issue). At this time it would often take hours for transactions to confirm.
I didn't know that, thanks for the info.
biolizard89 wrote:This is one of the major reasons why merged mining is so critical to a stable Namecoin blockchain.
I noticed the line smoothed out when merge mining was released in October 2011. Perhaps the namecoin hashrate was low enough to be just generally volitile before merge mining.

phelix
Posts: 1634
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:59 am

Re: What caused the dip in block rate in 2011?

Post by phelix »

BitcoinEXpress threatened to attack the Namecoin network. I think he never actually did so but realizing this vulnerability made the Namecoin Devs implement and introduce merged mining. Could be this is the time in between. Also biolizard89's explanation sounds good.
nx.bit - some namecoin stats
nf.bit - shortcut to this forum

Post Reply