.

Post Reply
signup292
Posts: 79
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 11:02 pm

.

Post by signup292 »

.
Last edited by signup292 on Sun Feb 22, 2015 1:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

phelix
Posts: 1634
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:59 am

Re: what just happened to the NMC distribution

Post by phelix »

signup292 wrote:Probably no one has a clue, but an interesting consolidation just shot up the #1 richest address to freakin 2.8 million NMC. The #1 used to be like 200,000 NMC. Just an interesting observation. Maybe one of the mining pools doing some consolidation. Or probably BTC-e.

bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-namecoin-addresses.html
I'd like to know, too. Has somebody inquired with BTC-e yet?
nx.bit - some namecoin stats
nf.bit - shortcut to this forum

georgem
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 1:46 pm
os: windows

Re: what just happened to the NMC distribution

Post by georgem »

Just someone consolidating all his 10k and 100k addresses into a big one...

Probably for narcissistic reasons? :D

http://bitinfocharts.com/namecoin/addre ... HzS3Qg3nNz

cassini
Posts: 336
Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 6:36 pm

Re: what just happened to the NMC distribution

Post by cassini »

This address received money from addresses like N3VQL7mZvSNL1WWoiJUnNp9TkpREnY9YhJ and NEQT4zo19ReCTsGXxhiqX9oFU2TkfVwWY2 that are the destinations of hundreds of newly generated 50.00000000 NMC blocks within a short period of time each. Therefore it is very likely they all belong to a big merged-mining pool. Ghash.io springs to mind.
Some miners at that pool have provided an NMC address, but the majority of the miners don't bother, and their hashing power turns into NMCs for free for that pool operator.
georgem wrote:Probably for narcissistic reasons?
I think they just did it for easy handling of one single cold wallet address.

signup292
Posts: 79
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 11:02 pm

.

Post by signup292 »

.
Last edited by signup292 on Sun Feb 22, 2015 1:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

phelix
Posts: 1634
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:59 am

Re: what just happened to the NMC distribution

Post by phelix »

cassini wrote:This address received money from addresses like N3VQL7mZvSNL1WWoiJUnNp9TkpREnY9YhJ and NEQT4zo19ReCTsGXxhiqX9oFU2TkfVwWY2 that are the destinations of hundreds of newly generated 50.00000000 NMC blocks within a short period of time each. Therefore it is very likely they all belong to a big merged-mining pool. Ghash.io springs to mind.
Some miners at that pool have provided an NMC address, but the majority of the miners don't bother, and their hashing power turns into NMCs for free for that pool operator.
Maybe BTCGuild? I think they have been mining NMC for a much longer time.

Anyway I don't like it.
nx.bit - some namecoin stats
nf.bit - shortcut to this forum

e234679
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 5:11 am
os: windows

Re: what just happened to the NMC distribution

Post by e234679 »

A worse case scenario, whoever's address it is ends up like mtgox, but I doubt it. A best case scenario, a major investor cut a deal with early adopters, and actually purchased it. Sounds like the most likely is that its just a consolidation into a secure address by a pool or exchange.

phelix
Posts: 1634
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:59 am

Re: what just happened to the NMC distribution

Post by phelix »

cassini wrote:This address received money from addresses like N3VQL7mZvSNL1WWoiJUnNp9TkpREnY9YhJ and NEQT4zo19ReCTsGXxhiqX9oFU2TkfVwWY2 that are the destinations of hundreds of newly generated 50.00000000 NMC blocks within a short period of time each. Therefore it is very likely they all belong to a big merged-mining pool. Ghash.io springs to mind.
Some miners at that pool have provided an NMC address, but the majority of the miners don't bother, and their hashing power turns into NMCs for free for that pool operator.
It might also be possible pool operators use BTC-e as their wallet...
nx.bit - some namecoin stats
nf.bit - shortcut to this forum

biolizard89
Posts: 2001
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 6:25 am
os: linux

Re: what just happened to the NMC distribution

Post by biolizard89 »

signup292 wrote:hopefully this helps discount the myth that 90% of NMC are held by like 40 people just sitting on their NMC doing nothing waiting for others to create value in them
I'm not following... how is this related?
Jeremy Rand, Lead Namecoin Application Engineer
NameID: id/jeremy
DyName: Dynamic DNS update client for .bit domains.

Donations: BTC 1EcUWRa9H6ZuWPkF3BDj6k4k1vCgv41ab8 ; NMC NFqbaS7ReiQ9MBmsowwcDSmp4iDznjmEh5

phelix
Posts: 1634
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:59 am

Re: what just happened to the NMC distribution

Post by phelix »

Address was emptied...

http://bitinfocharts.com/namecoin/addre ... HzS3Qg3nNz


btw: bitinfocharts is pretty cool
nx.bit - some namecoin stats
nf.bit - shortcut to this forum

Post Reply