I will do my best to get miners, what's plan B?
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 7:27 pm
- os: windows
I will do my best to get miners, what's plan B?
May I suggest a miner only namcoind that will reject blocks outside of a trusted group of miners pools?
I'm just throwing ideas out here any one care to chime in?
I'm just throwing ideas out here any one care to chime in?
Re: I will do my best to get miners, what's plan B?
Get as many as possible, especially pools to upgrade to a checkpoint protected version of namcoind such as https://github.com/zamgo/namecoin/commi ... 628#diff-0 or ifDavincij15 wrote:May I suggest a miner only namcoind that will reject blocks outside of a trusted group of miners pools?
I'm just throwing ideas out here any one care to chime in?
they are using multicoin-exp, the latest config file ( http://exchange.beertokens.info/docs/mu ... f.namecoin ).
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 7:35 pm
Re: I will do my best to get miners, what's plan B?
I would suggest setting a lock in point and quit wasting time on it. ArtForz has provided a genius idea on rolling past lock in points however. Hashing power is your only real solution at the moment. Good luck.
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 7:27 pm
- os: windows
Re: I will do my best to get miners, what's plan B?
If you destroy things it means people have a right to destroy what you have as well, should they have enough power to do so.BitcoinEXpress wrote:I would suggest setting a lock in point and quit wasting time on it. ArtForz has provided a genius idea on rolling past lock in points however. Hashing power is your only real solution at the moment. Good luck.
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:58 am
- os: linux
Re: I will do my best to get miners, what's plan B?
Now, now. This kind of threat is no way to answer a good suggestion. Davinci, if you, Nodemaster, and doublec all start using a lockin-enabled client such as zamgo's we'll be much better off, and I'll put it on Abe until khal and vinced come back to their keyboards.Davincij15 wrote: If you destroy things it means people have a right to destroy what you have as well, should they have enough power to do so.
The attack will not erase blocks from our disks. The only long-term threat to Namecoin here is if more miners want it dead than want to merge-mine it. So let's learn from the SolidCoin spectacle and remain respectful and businesslike, shall we? We can emerge stronger thanks to BCX.
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 7:35 pm
Re: I will do my best to get miners, what's plan B?
+1000johntobey253 wrote:Now, now. This kind of threat is no way to answer a good suggestion. Davinci, if you, Nodemaster, and doublec all start using a lockin-enabled client such as zamgo's we'll be much better off, and I'll put it on Abe until khal and vinced come back to their keyboards.Davincij15 wrote: If you destroy things it means people have a right to destroy what you have as well, should they have enough power to do so.
The attack will not erase blocks from our disks. The only long-term threat to Namecoin here is if more miners want it dead than want to merge-mine it. So let's learn from the SolidCoin spectacle and remain respectful and businesslike, shall we? We can emerge stronger thanks to BCX.
Re: I will do my best to get miners, what's plan B?
Davincij15 wrote:If you destroy things it means people have a right to destroy what you have as well, should they have enough power to do so.BitcoinEXpress wrote:I would suggest setting a lock in point and quit wasting time on it. ArtForz has provided a genius idea on rolling past lock in points however. Hashing power is your only real solution at the moment. Good luck.
The funny thing is Davinci I don't think BitcoinEXpress equipment he is using is actually HIS.
That's the funny part. He's likely doing this attack on someone else's dime which is a douche tactic.
Also I find it funny that he tried to pin his attack/intentions on my exposing him on mining on the GG network.
Laughable.
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 7:27 pm
- os: windows
Re: I will do my best to get miners, what's plan B?
With respect insults and soap opera drama discussions are not what I'm interested in. I want save namecoin not ridicule the attacker. Once we win we will have time point and laugh.smoothie wrote:Davincij15 wrote:If you destroy things it means people have a right to destroy what you have as well, should they have enough power to do so.BitcoinEXpress wrote:I would suggest setting a lock in point and quit wasting time on it. ArtForz has provided a genius idea on rolling past lock in points however. Hashing power is your only real solution at the moment. Good luck.
The funny thing is Davinci I don't think BitcoinEXpress equipment he is using is actually HIS.
That's the funny part. He's likely doing this attack on someone else's dime which is a douche tactic.
Also I find it funny that he tried to pin his attack/intentions on my exposing him on mining on the GG network.
Laughable.
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 7:35 pm
Re: I will do my best to get miners, what's plan B?
Funny Smoothie, what do you base your assumptions on? In a way you are correct, only 68 GH/s and possibly 75 GH/s by 19100 of the 250 GH /s that's definitely commited will be mine. I'm shocked at the number of people we turned away. It would have been right at 1000 GH /s if everyone were accepted. We only took people with more than 5 gh /s, Linux, and some coding skills.
@Davinci, what would another 50-60 GH /s do for your pool?
One of your users was kind enough to provide me with a PPS login.
@Davinci, what would another 50-60 GH /s do for your pool?
One of your users was kind enough to provide me with a PPS login.
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 7:27 pm
- os: windows
Re: I will do my best to get miners, what's plan B?
Evil is what evil does. I did not think people like you existed. People who would use vast amounts or resources just to destroy because they could. I have learned that crazy destructive animals such as yourself do exist and must be factored in to any product.BitcoinEXpress wrote:Funny Smoothie, what do you base your assumptions on? In a way you are correct, only 68 GH/s and possibly 75 GH/s by 19100 of the 250 GH /s that's definitely commited will be mine. I'm shocked at the number of people we turned away. It would have been right at 1000 GH /s if everyone were accepted. We only took people with more than 5 gh /s, Linux, and some coding skills.
@Davinci, what would another 50-60 GH /s do for your pool?
One of your users was kind enough to provide me with a PPS login.