Page 3 of 3

Re: Funding the libcoin rebase a bit

Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:31 am
by domob
foglight wrote:i would like to put up this bounty. but if it's ok, i'm just sending straight to you domob.

$100/625(bitstamp price) / 0.00288 (nmc/btc) = ~55.55555555 nmc

40486785fdcb5ca6e03ba1df04c398c312318b0761c35b050bbaf72fc607293f

good luck!
Thank you very much! So now I'm off implementing name_filter and name_scan.... ;)

Re: Funding the libcoin rebase a bit

Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2014 9:27 am
by domob
domob wrote:
foglight wrote:i would like to put up this bounty. but if it's ok, i'm just sending straight to you domob.

$100/625(bitstamp price) / 0.00288 (nmc/btc) = ~55.55555555 nmc

40486785fdcb5ca6e03ba1df04c398c312318b0761c35b050bbaf72fc607293f

good luck!
Thank you very much! So now I'm off implementing name_filter and name_scan.... ;)
https://github.com/namecoin/libcoin/pull/15

Testing welcome. If something doesn't work as expected for someone who uses these functions (I usually do not), let me know. I'll send the patches to Michael Gronager for upstream inclusion.

Re: Funding the libcoin rebase a bit

Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:31 am
by biolizard89
Hi domob,

Would some funding be useful to get https://www.bountysource.com/issues/316 ... management implemented? If so, is it possible for you to estimate the funds needed? FreeSpeechMe can possibly fund some of this.

Thanks.

Re: Funding the libcoin rebase a bit

Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 8:09 am
by domob
biolizard89 wrote:Would some funding be useful to get https://www.bountysource.com/issues/316 ... management implemented? If so, is it possible for you to estimate the funds needed? FreeSpeechMe can possibly fund some of this.
Definitely! However, currently I'm both waiting on Michael to merge my name_filter & name_scan pull request, and on vacation. I'll take a look at the respective code to estimate how much effort these will be and work on them afterwards.

Re: Funding the libcoin rebase a bit

Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:27 am
by biolizard89
Hi, the FreeSpeechMe fund will match BountySource bounties on this issue 1:1 up to $50 (so total bounty up to $100).

https://www.bountysource.com/issues/316 ... management

Anyone want to donate?

Re: Funding the libcoin rebase a bit

Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2014 11:16 pm
by biolizard89
biolizard89 wrote:Hi, the FreeSpeechMe fund will match BountySource bounties on this issue 1:1 up to $50 (so total bounty up to $100).

https://www.bountysource.com/issues/316 ... management

Anyone want to donate?
Since no one's biting, I've funded it $100. My previous offer is now closed.

Re: Funding the libcoin rebase a bit

Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2014 9:15 am
by domob
biolizard89 wrote:Since no one's biting, I've funded it $100. My previous offer is now closed.
Thanks, very cool! I ran into some issues with libcoin's wallet, but once they are fixed (one patch is already submitted that at least partially fixes the problems), I'll start with name_new. In the mean time, I implemented name_list which is pending as pull request right now.

Re: Funding the libcoin rebase a bit

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2014 4:43 am
by indolering
@Domob, so, are all read-only name operations working?

Re: Funding the libcoin rebase a bit

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2014 8:39 am
by domob
indolering wrote:@Domob, so, are all read-only name operations working?
Yes. Actually already since some time. (I don't count "name_list" to them, since it is based on a wallet - but also name_list should work now, although there are other bugs in upstream and thus I've not yet pushed libcoin/libcoin (containing name_list) to namecoin/libcoin.)