So, I wrote script that get data by command name_filter with regexp ^d/[a-z]([a-z0-9-]{0,62}[a-z0-9])?$.biolizard89 wrote:This would indeed be useful information to have. In related work, Jonas has been doing some experiments with making the YaCy search engine crawl .bit websites, which would also give us useful information on how much real-world usage there is of .bit.virus_net wrote:Now I`am working at domain names statistics script. I want to do graph that can show how many domain names was at that date, how many of them was expired at that date and how many of them resolving/working.
Because for today .bit have 72320 domain names but we can`t understand now how many of them really used/working.
Results are awful For today:
- Total: 72408 domains
Null value field: 31179 domains
Value field JSON parse error: 16079 domains
No useful data found (ip or ns or alias): 23087 domains
Usefull data found (ip or ns or alias): 2063 domains
If someone interested in debug log of the script it is avaliable here: https://bitname.ru/tmp/name_scan_nf.txt
I think the best data in value field are these:
peeper.bit wrote: I'm Plasmmer. Plasmmer is my nickname. I was born with the full name Daniell Wilson Jose Mesquita, on the city of Cascavel, state of Parana, in Brazil. I was born in April 9 of the 1997 year, and currently I'm 20 years old. I declare I'm owner of this Namecoin address, of this domain (peeper.bit), of any copyrights/registers I do by using file hash codes in transactions and of any files registered here.
After this:cryptostamp.bit wrote: on that subject, here are two hashes I may later use to prove some party with losses was not related to this: 48be8a34e1a972b7299f52d11ec5c1a68070b5be5f342a997657b385e1f73830 282af96c48c3ed5864b8e5a521452bbca9f8b7b85b8ddf6307415e2d11b67f05 e7ab179d9020e2ab1800853e504a43ef2c7dd217740a00909c98218044123b6b
one question is coming up, question to the developers:Value field JSON parse error: 16079 domains
Why there is no value field cheking before sending it to the chain ?