RPC interface / raw transactions for safe name trading
-
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 9:33 pm
Re: RPC interface / raw transactions for safe name trading
now this is done - how can someone list a name for sale, which is visible to others?
e.g. is it possible to have some values for a name like forsale=yes, yet also the client know that it is actually for sale - i.e. half the tx is already available - and also ability for the seller to revoke it
obviously this is a step by step process -
and good work from both domob and phelix
but, it's needed in the QT (imo ;d)-- I think this would give namecoin a well needed boost
(common sense image below)
excuse crude mspaint
i know previously when I posted some people weren't to positive about it being in the QT - although it could just be a seperate repo or a switch to enable when compile?
anyway - I think we can possibly offer a decent bounty from Huntercoin for it - it should be then easy to port over (for domob ) -- but, this would need to be in the (or other) QT to be eligible for the bounty
e.g. is it possible to have some values for a name like forsale=yes, yet also the client know that it is actually for sale - i.e. half the tx is already available - and also ability for the seller to revoke it
obviously this is a step by step process -
and good work from both domob and phelix
but, it's needed in the QT (imo ;d)-- I think this would give namecoin a well needed boost
(common sense image below)
excuse crude mspaint
i know previously when I posted some people weren't to positive about it being in the QT - although it could just be a seperate repo or a switch to enable when compile?
anyway - I think we can possibly offer a decent bounty from Huntercoin for it - it should be then easy to port over (for domob ) -- but, this would need to be in the (or other) QT to be eligible for the bounty
Re: RPC interface / raw transactions for safe name trading
It certainly would be nice. But it would probably be much easier to create it externally, e.g. in an NMControl http GUI.snailbrain wrote:now this is done - how can someone list a name for sale, which is visible to others?
e.g. is it possible to have some values for a name like forsale=yes, yet also the client know that it is actually for sale - i.e. half the tx is already available - and also ability for the seller to revoke it
obviously this is a step by step process -
and good work from both domob and phelix
but, it's needed in the QT (imo ;d)-- I think this would give namecoin a well needed boost
(common sense image below)
excuse crude mspaint
i know previously when I posted some people weren't to positive about it being in the QT - although it could just be a seperate repo or a switch to enable when compile?
anyway - I think we can possibly offer a decent bounty from Huntercoin for it - it should be then easy to port over (for domob ) -- but, this would need to be in the (or other) QT to be eligible for the bounty
Alternatively it might be a good solution to put it into a modified Bitmessage version for anonymous exchange of offers (btw: a modified Bitmessage version using id/names EVERYHWHERE would be nice, too).
I don't think we should bloat the blockchain with offers, should we? Then we could do everything inside Namecoin.
-
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 9:33 pm
Re: RPC interface / raw transactions for safe name trading
offers would be done offchain
only set values for sale would be saved in the name value
but, i don't understand enough to know if the "half of tx" takes up significant space
--
ultimately needs to be insanely easy for none crypto people - like purchasing names is in the qt
only set values for sale would be saved in the name value
but, i don't understand enough to know if the "half of tx" takes up significant space
--
ultimately needs to be insanely easy for none crypto people - like purchasing names is in the qt
Re: RPC interface / raw transactions for safe name trading
Unfortunately only the buyer can create the unfinished atomic tx... but the seller could just write a price he would sell for in the value.snailbrain wrote:offers would be done offchain
only set values for sale would be saved in the name value
but, i don't understand enough to know if the "half of tx" takes up significant space
+1ultimately needs to be insanely easy for none crypto people - like purchasing names is in the qt
-
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 9:33 pm
Re: RPC interface / raw transactions for safe name trading
ok thanks, now understand it (or at least what i need to know) - i'll read the wiki next timeUnfortunately only the buyer can create the unfinished atomic tx... but the seller could just write a price he would sell for in the value.snailbrain wrote:offers would be done offchain
only set values for sale would be saved in the name value
but, i don't understand enough to know if the "half of tx" takes up significant space
will think some more <3
-
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 9:33 pm
Re: RPC interface / raw transactions for safe name trading
we can use khals sendmessagetoname thing which hasn't been added yet - for offers?
think he suggested this at one point
not sure how it works
think he suggested this at one point
not sure how it works
-
- Posts: 2001
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 6:25 am
- os: linux
Re: RPC interface / raw transactions for safe name trading
I think Bitmessage is pretty well suited to trade negotiation / discovery. Probably easier to use that than to reinvent the wheel.
-
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 9:33 pm
Re: RPC interface / raw transactions for safe name trading
after more thought.. probably yes :/biolizard89 wrote:I think Bitmessage is pretty well suited to trade negotiation / discovery. Probably easier to use that than to reinvent the wheel.
i just thought it would be ultimate to have name trading in the QT..
I think it would make name trading 100x more popular than if they have to use bitmessage as well.
Maybe it's time to make namecoin Sedo
Re: RPC interface / raw transactions for safe name trading
+++1 for Name Trading - and its OVER time to make Namecoin Sedo Just do it. Its a big game changer together with renewal fees. A squatters dream (or better said domaintraders dream - both sides will be satisfied)snailbrain wrote:after more thought.. probably yes :/biolizard89 wrote:I think Bitmessage is pretty well suited to trade negotiation / discovery. Probably easier to use that than to reinvent the wheel.
i just thought it would be ultimate to have name trading in the QT..
I think it would make name trading 100x more popular than if they have to use bitmessage as well.
Maybe it's time to make namecoin Sedo
Best regards,
Sudo.
NameID: id/sudo.wonder >>> Namecoin @ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/namecoin.org
Re: RPC interface / raw transactions for safe name trading
I fully agree here that atomic name trading could be "the next big thing" for Namecoin. The foundations are already there with my RPC extensions (already merged for some time - see also my workflow description on the wiki) and phelix' command-line scripts. Now it just takes someone to build a UI to it, ideally together with a system to broadcast offers.sudoquai wrote:+++1 for Name Trading - and its OVER time to make Namecoin Sedo Just do it. Its a big game changer together with renewal fees. A squatters dream (or better said domaintraders dream - both sides will be satisfied)snailbrain wrote:after more thought.. probably yes :/biolizard89 wrote:I think Bitmessage is pretty well suited to trade negotiation / discovery. Probably easier to use that than to reinvent the wheel.
i just thought it would be ultimate to have name trading in the QT..
I think it would make name trading 100x more popular than if they have to use bitmessage as well.
Maybe it's time to make namecoin Sedo
BTC: 1domobKsPZ5cWk2kXssD8p8ES1qffGUCm | NMC: NCdomobcmcmVdxC5yxMitojQ4tvAtv99pY
BM-GtQnWM3vcdorfqpKXsmfHQ4rVYPG5pKS
Use your Namecoin identity as OpenID: https://nameid.org/
BM-GtQnWM3vcdorfqpKXsmfHQ4rVYPG5pKS
Use your Namecoin identity as OpenID: https://nameid.org/