Search found 1429 matches
- Mon Feb 08, 2016 9:46 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: IPFS support
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4132
IPFS support
If you have not checked out IPFS you should do it: https://ipfs.io It looks like a great match for Namecoin as it allows storage of files by hash very easily. Note that ipfs is not anonymous: https://github.com/ipfs/faq/issues/18 I have created a patch that adds IPFS support to NMControl: https://gi...
- Mon Feb 08, 2016 8:12 am
- Forum: Project direction
- Topic: .bit Redirection to Legacy Domains
- Replies: 2
- Views: 37447
.bit Redirection to Legacy Domains
With a proxy solution it should be very easy to implement something like this:
mysite.bit ---> whateverlengthydomain.org/somepath/moarpath/
Is "alias" or "translate" from the d/ spec ok to use (what is the difference between these btw?)?
mysite.bit ---> whateverlengthydomain.org/somepath/moarpath/
Is "alias" or "translate" from the d/ spec ok to use (what is the difference between these btw?)?
- Sun Feb 07, 2016 10:18 pm
- Forum: Project direction
- Topic: Hardfork 2016 Value Size Limit
- Replies: 24
- Views: 108375
Re: Hardfork 2016 Value Size Limit
Reopening previous discussions is bad practice but I can't help it: (from https://forum.namecoin.info/viewtopic.php?p=6574#p6574) [...] Assuming that a single large-value name is more expensive than multiple small-value names, then users will only use long-valued names for use cases such as the 4k ...
- Sun Feb 07, 2016 10:08 am
- Forum: Project direction
- Topic: What next? [Namecoin Roadmap]
- Replies: 38
- Views: 131847
Re: What next? [Namecoin Roadmap]
Updated mostly adding links: https://github.com/namecoin/meta/pull/32/files Current version: https://github.com/namecoin/meta/blob/master/roadmap.md New version: https://github.com/namecoin/meta/blob/phelixbtc-patch-2/roadmap.md I would like to merge this soon. For anyone who wants to know or have a...
- Fri Feb 05, 2016 10:36 am
- Forum: Project direction
- Topic: Hardfork 2016 Value Size Limit
- Replies: 24
- Views: 108375
Re: Hardfork 2016 Value Size Limit
I'll post a more thorough analysis of this later, once I try to analyze the economic arguments. But, we should consider whether it's possible to implement value size changes without a hardfork. In particular, how do the Namecoin consensus rules view a name_update that has more than 2 PUSHDATA ops? ...
- Fri Feb 05, 2016 9:34 am
- Forum: Bounties
- Topic: Google Summer of Code 2016
- Replies: 8
- Views: 52915
Re: Google Summer of Code 2016
Well then. I opened this thread a month ago so that we could try to get things done ahead of time. Joseph is the only one who has assisted substantively in the past month. At this point, if we can only get 2 people to look at a wiki page or forum thread in a month, I don't think I can in good consc...
- Fri Feb 05, 2016 9:31 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Getting Jekyll deployed soon
- Replies: 8
- Views: 9537
Re: Getting Jekyll deployed soon
If not, I suggest that we consider pushing a commit to the old site which does an HTML redirect to the version of the Jekyll site that is hosted by github.io. The benefit is that this is trivial to deploy and can be done very quickly. The drawback is that end users would see a github.io URL instead...
- Fri Jan 29, 2016 4:49 pm
- Forum: Tools, GUI & other softwares
- Topic: NMControl 0.8.1 download
- Replies: 2
- Views: 35018
Re: NMControl 0.8.1 download
Oops. Sorry, should be fixed now.haiqu wrote:Tried to download NMControl 0.8.1 for Windows from this link: https://namecoin.org/?p=download but I get a 404 error. Anyone on here have access to fix this?
- Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:53 am
- Forum: Bounties
- Topic: [NMDF] Namecoin Bounty Cornucopia
- Replies: 67
- Views: 265066
Re: [NMDF] Namecoin Bounty Cornucopia
They talked to me extensively and discussed it on IRC. Feel free to check the IRC logs on #namecoin-meeting. I believe there is more than reasonable consensus that BitcoinJ is an acceptable way to go about SPV support (indeed, all of the P2P SPV Bitcoin clients on bitcoin.org use BitcoinJ), so I'm ...
- Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:51 am
- Forum: Tools, GUI & other softwares
- Topic: Module Request: Keep a Namespace in Sync
- Replies: 21
- Views: 102361
Re: Module Request: Keep a Namespace in Sync
I wrote a patch for Namecoin Core which adds a name_sync command, which is used to implement namesync. It's in a subdirectory of this repository but github is down so: https://github.com/hlandau/namesync Hit! Once again I am impressed by the thorough specification and general sophistication of your...