Search found 26 matches
- Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:49 pm
- Forum: Project direction
- Topic: Merged mining + timetravel fix @19200 - must upgrade
- Replies: 156
- Views: 185305
Re: Merged mining block number - 19200 - must upgrade
I have a new release here: https://github.com/vinced/namecoin/tree/nc0.3.24.63 This version corrects the timetravel (2015-2016 retarget) bug starting at the first retarget after block 19200. This version will fork testnet at block 4032 (second retarget). I believe we are safe from timetravel with t...
- Fri Sep 16, 2011 12:20 am
- Forum: Project direction
- Topic: Merged mining + timetravel fix @19200 - must upgrade
- Replies: 156
- Views: 185305
Re: Merged mining block number - 19200 - must upgrade
khal wrote:Version 0.3.24.62 has been posted on homepage. Thanks twobits for the osx + win releases.
You are welcome. One thing to note though, the max os x build is actually 32 bits, and should be runable on both 32 and 64 bit systems.
- Wed Sep 14, 2011 10:01 am
- Forum: Project direction
- Topic: Merged mining + timetravel fix @19200 - must upgrade
- Replies: 156
- Views: 185305
Re: Merged mining block number - 19200 - must upgrade
However I get an error trying to compile on osx.... g++ -c -mmacosx-version-min=10.5 -arch i386 -Os -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wformat - g -DwxDEBUG_LEVEL=0 -I/usr/local/lib/wx/include/osx_cocoa-unicode-static-2.9 -I/ usr/local/include/wx-2.9 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DwxDEBUG_LEVEL=0 -D__WXMAC__ -D __WX...
- Tue Sep 13, 2011 2:25 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: I have lost all communications with Namecoin network
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4015
Re: I have lost all communications with Namecoin network
Exactly what version of namecoind are you running in each case?
- Tue Sep 13, 2011 12:38 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Namecoin is Prime for a 51% attack
- Replies: 61
- Views: 71614
Re: Namecoin is Prime for a 51% attack
nice try twobits, none of those hashes exist... grrr but hey thanks for implementing the method, I would put my custom block hashes in place I took the hashes from zamgo's patch I linked to. I compiled and ran it on a virutal machine, and with those checks in place it successfully downloaded the bl...
- Tue Sep 13, 2011 9:23 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Namecoin is Prime for a 51% attack
- Replies: 61
- Views: 71614
Re: Namecoin is Prime for a 51% attack
Can this be hardcoded into the namecoin client software? Please provide an updated client version that will revert back to block 19100 once this attack is over. Run a client that has a recent checkpoint and it'll refuse to accept any chain that was rewritten before that checkpoint. Are you able to ...
- Tue Sep 13, 2011 6:38 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: I will do my best to get miners, what's plan B?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 10207
Re: I will do my best to get miners, what's plan B?
May I suggest a miner only namcoind that will reject blocks outside of a trusted group of miners pools? I'm just throwing ideas out here any one care to chime in? Get as many as possible, especially pools to upgrade to a checkpoint protected version of namcoind such as https://github.com/zamgo/name...
- Mon Sep 12, 2011 5:54 pm
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Let's build some merged mining pools!
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8082
Re: Let's build some merged mining pools!
This thread is for all people who are willing to start a merged mining pool and need input on this issue or want to ask some question: We started here: http://dot-bit.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1887#p1887 but felt, that this thread would be more appropriate in the technical support subforum. Hmmm......
- Mon Sep 12, 2011 5:48 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Namecoin is Prime for a 51% attack
- Replies: 61
- Views: 71614
Re: Namecoin is Prime for a 51% attack
We are different people and our differences need to be set aside for a common goal. I do not disrespect your attitude even though I do not agree with it because I know differences is not a bad thing, we all can't act the same way or we would be Borgs. Try not to take offence to anything I say, if y...
- Mon Sep 12, 2011 2:07 pm
- Forum: Mining
- Topic: NMC/BTC Mining pool [No wait payouts PPS 100+ GHs]
- Replies: 93
- Views: 214356
Re: New NameCoin Mining pool [No wait payouts 10+ Mhs]
Due to the possibly upcoming attack of BitcoinEXpress ( http://bit.ly/poTuzs ) nmcbit will not pay out NMC for your safety. All your namecoins are safe. That may not be true. Since there are no checkpoints in the nmc clients, if he really wanted to he could go back and rewrite history. Depends just...