Namecoin Forum

khal wrote:Yes, but i keep the time of last commit. Maybe i shouldn't ?

No, that works ... keep the time of last commit. Thanks.

(I was confused with the previous binaries not being built from last commit.)

Ok, thanks. I'll check it but I'm determined to build my own on Fedora.

Edit: Did you update the main page?
http://dot-bit.org/Main_Page
The date release still says 2011-05-17.

My namecoins from yesterday's mining showed up so it was working anyway. Newbie nerves.

Indeed, all versions on the dot-bit homepage should include the patch to show immature blocks. Did you use an older version and then switched to the new one without stopping/restarting namecoin ? Otherwise, i may have done a mistake (but i compiled the 32bit version from a fresh git clone which inc...

Hey, thanx khal. So looks like the port settings are fine, thanx for clarifying that. SO now the unconfirmed blocks do not show up with the $./namecoind listtransactions but the binary i'm using is the linux 32 bit from here http://dot-bit.org/Main_Page dated 17-05-2011 so probably shouldn't be expe...

OK, did this and got some blocks "accepted". While waiting for the 120 blocks to chug through is there any way to check on "unconfirmed blocks" that I have mined using namecoind API? Also, I set ports in .namecoin/bitcoin.conf to 8336 and miners to point at 8336 and seems to run fine on that side. B...