Namecoin Forum

Could contracts be written in to the blockchain? Lets say personA and personB will make a contract. They have an id/persona{'publickey':'PKA', ...} and id/personb{'publikkey':'PKB', ...}. In a namespace contract/ (still not specified) they could make an entry: contract/contractAB{'partyA':'persona'...

1. .bit --> clearnet (ipv6/ipv4 and everything else) 2. .tor/.t --> evrything intended to be seen on tor (a. all .onion addresses and b. may be some clearnet addresses also intended to be seen on tor in an oppressive country) 3. .i2p/.i/.2 --> i2p only ----------- But I am not sure if 2b wouldn't cr...

The Namecoin client is not in the repository by Ubuntu and by Debian. I don't know how it is by the others but as I remember I didn't saw by opensuse also. But I must say that the Bitcoin client is also in the 3.6 version by Debian and non of the clients is in Ubuntu. I think more people would try N...

For the record, I think enlarging the data field limit by 20 times is a bad idea. I'm also not sure about 9k - what about fixing the bug so that we end up with the originally planned 1k? (And of course introduce graceful failing for larger values instead of the current behaviour of silently being s...

What about creating a g/ namespace specification and may be a dedicated API also which could be used generally for the most MMOGs ? Important parts could be stored as g/ names but more game specific and quickly changing states would remain in a game own storage system(central or decentralized). This...

Your argumentation is based on a very high level understanding of networking and that makes it difficult for the most people to argument against it. They are also all valid points but it is focused to much on the service providers and not on the users. Why separate namespaces/TLD's for different res...

It would be fine to have a namecoin API like bitcoin has by blockchain.info to make browser based namecoin transfers from private key and may be browser based domain operations also in a similar way.
This tool could be adapted:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=266915.0

Hi Chris.
Happy to have a new namecoiner.
It would be fine to have by us somebody who could bring for Namecoin the same popularity and value increasing rate like by Feathercoin.
By 16x coin generation it should be 16x FTC price, so 1NMC ~ 0.02 BTC.

Sounds interesting. I was also thinking about something similar. But what about using namecoin as store system for - account login like g/hannibal, g/caesar and for - items like it/goldscepter, it/silverscepter The game issuer sells the items for namecoins and after then it can be traded like .bit d...

How do you like this ?