Namecoin Forum

Although, I would prefer to keep the lighter blue as the website design uses that color.

Unfortunately there is no "the current logo" as the logos currently used are all slightly different. Different as in coloring and shadow of the N, color of the coin, Indolering style rotation of the N or not, color of the text. Our own websites and software sometimes use two different logos next to...

biolizard89 wrote: Every name_update generates a new public key, so I don't see how that would make any sense.

Ahh, well I didn't know that and it certainly doesn't!

And, for the record, I vote to keep the current logo.

We need an official logo that we have rights on. I would like to see some sort of legitimation through a vote or whatever. I contacted the original owner and we have the rights to it. Put some pressure on this thing? It seems like you are provoking a confrontation, why didn't you bring this up in a...

Somewhat related to this discussion (insofar as I believe that part of the discussion that prompted this idea had to do with d/name and dd/name getting out of sync) is my proposal to allow owners of d/name to control the creation of d/name/child. We could just tie the child's registration period to ...

It seems like you are trying to specify a unique ID for each owner of the name, so why not just count the number of public keys that have owned the address? If you are trying to tie things to the initial registration, we could output a short hash of the public key, domain name, and the name_new hash...

Note that this would also be a more secure replacement of the practice of setting up an import. For example, in d/ it is recommended that users setup a record under dd/name and import this record from d/name, enabling users to store d/name in cold storage. Using d/name/import would be more secure si...

So, I was thinking about the problem we are having with OneName providing another identity service on the blockchain under a legacy namespace. We all agree that duplicate namespaces are a serious problem, but resolving the current situation is tricky. However, I think I've figured out a solution to ...

We very much appreciate your submission to RFA’s Open Technology Fund for consideration. We have been reviewing many projects and appreciate your patience during the process. Upon evaluation of your submission, we have decided to invite you to submit a full proposal. Yay! I will be working on it th...