Namecoin Forum

My biggest concern ATM is merged-mine-proxy. I'd really like to see the functionality added to pushpoold. I agree this is a big worry... Once merged starts there's going to a lot more hash power directed at some of the NMC pools. Given that existing NMC pools are likely to be the earliest adopters....

0.2.5 released... [0.2.5] - update to jsonrpc lib - force JsonRpcRequest.getId() to return a default value (-1) if not set. Some clients don't implement spec properly and this was causing a nullpointerException. - Cleaned up directory layout for distribution. - Fix: classpath problem for windows ser...

0.2.2 is released... I've just finished writing up the results of some extensive performance tests of poolserverj against pushpoold. Write up can be found here along with - test methodology - test setup - all the tools necessary to reproduce the tests on you own setup For the TLDR crowd a quick summ...

Oh I see what you mean now... Blkmond function is integrated. It just uses getblockcount requests to the daemons. A polling approach unfortunately but couldn't work out a push method. It allows a max of 1 second between polls per daemon so with multiple daemons you shouldn't see much delay. Is there...

Not sure what you mean by half-node. I followed the spec on deepbit. Accepts GET or POST. Holds connection open until blockchange. Responds with normal getwork result. I did originally write the header immediately and write the body on block change but I don't think that's correct so I changed it to...

Please excuse the blatant copy and paste from the bitcoin forum. Everything I've said there is relevant to namecoid as well. I haven't had a chance to test with namecoind as yet but I don't think there's any reason PoolServerJ shouldn't be compatible... As a necessary component to a larger project I...