Search found 255 matches
- Wed Jun 08, 2011 2:52 am
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: someone elses SetBestChain
- Replies: 10
- Views: 9988
Re: someone elses SetBestChain
Okay I've got a different build running now so we'll see how it goes. (You can stop listening to my bleating for now.)
- Wed Jun 08, 2011 2:25 am
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: someone elses SetBestChain
- Replies: 10
- Views: 9988
Re: someone elses SetBestChain
"ConnectInputsHook() : connecting inputs on eebb638c655ea523a41b685aaf47a545eaaff8564fbf5de1c0737eb9836cfd07 which was not in pending - must be someone elses" And this seems to mean that a transaction in a block that was received was not in the list of pending transactions on your node. ie. It's a ...
- Wed Jun 08, 2011 2:20 am
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: someone elses SetBestChain
- Replies: 10
- Views: 9988
Re: someone elses SetBestChain
or are we all clueless? I don't see any of this type of thing in any of my namecoin logs (on 4 different machines). What version of the client are you running? Well, I think it is the latest version, icbw. http://dot-bit.org/files/namecoin_linux32.tgz Built on fedora 12. I'll have another look at t...
- Wed Jun 08, 2011 1:45 am
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: someone elses SetBestChain
- Replies: 10
- Views: 9988
Re: someone elses SetBestChain
sending: getdata (145 bytes) received: block (40378 bytes) received block 00000000000af3ea0b22 ConnectInputsHook() : connecting inputs on 51e28ac7e566de4cfa12d6ab3c3ed2c52fa0b89826c6f344be3e2f0a230bb352 which was not in pending - must be someone elsesConnectInputsHook() : connecting inputs on 230ea...
- Tue Jun 07, 2011 11:17 pm
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: someone elses SetBestChain
- Replies: 10
- Views: 9988
Re: someone elses SetBestChain
bump ... it is happening again. Anybody have an explanation for what this message means? received: block (2792 bytes) received block 0000000000068aefbabc ConnectInputsHook() : connecting inputs on 03173ecaaedb4053c6974ab7d5e4507dedb14bb4915272120d7c8e7d32a4be01 which was not in pending - must be som...
- Tue Jun 07, 2011 1:53 pm
- Forum: Mining
- Topic: How to output what comms between miner and client?
- Replies: 0
- Views: 4986
How to output what comms between miner and client?
Is there a standard method for outputting the comms. between namecoind and any miner that is getting work from it?
Thnx.
Thnx.
- Tue Jun 07, 2011 1:20 pm
- Forum: Mining
- Topic: Orphan block
- Replies: 9
- Views: 10521
Re: Orphan block
There is some very strange behaviour surrounding orphan blocks going on the namecoin network. Of the 11 orphan blocks I have so far 10 have all been orphaned by competing blocks within 60 seconds of my block getting solved. This means the network has found two blocks inside 90 seconds after I found ...
- Tue Jun 07, 2011 12:18 pm
- Forum: Tools, GUI & other softwares
- Topic: Namecoin fallback nodes
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5936
Re: Namecoin fallback nodes
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Fallback_Nodes
In the interests of transparency we should probably post somewhere who those IP's belong to that are hard-coded into namecoin.
Edit: Where can I find those IP's in the code? thnx.
In the interests of transparency we should probably post somewhere who those IP's belong to that are hard-coded into namecoin.
Edit: Where can I find those IP's in the code? thnx.
- Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:52 am
- Forum: Tools, GUI & other softwares
- Topic: Namecoin testnet
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3556
Namecoin testnet
Reposted here reference.
khal said:
khal said:
You can bootstrap with my node :
You will see only one or two others nodes :pCode: Select all
./namecoind -testnet -addnode 178.32.31.41
- Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:45 am
- Forum: Tools, GUI & other softwares
- Topic: Namecoin fallback nodes
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5936
Namecoin fallback nodes
Anybody going to put their hands up for this one?