Namecoin Forum

Care to explain? this is news to me. Nobody has contacted me with any complaints.

Just to nitpick a bit - I googled the licensing (I'm not familliar with them) and it seems there is a "Creative Commons: Public domain" http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ . CC3.0 requires attribution. This is the same license bitcoin's logo uses, although I don't see many websites cor...

Probably releasing to the public domain so one may do with as they wish, with no attribution or other restrictions.

They're all very nice, good work. I prefer the pulsar one - but why must the new logo look so much like every other "coin" logo out there? If that's the case, why not just stick with the original, it's good too, and recognized. Can you do an example of the pulsar one (seems rather popular) with the ...

Android app is a way off yet, until there is a SPV client - and then how to handle the name functions.. lots to do!

Join us on IRC https://namecoin.org/discussion and subscribe to the mailing list http://namecoin.info/cgi-bin/mailman/li ... ecoin.info

I think the history idea is great. The logs are archived at archive.org - Begin here: https://web.archive.org/web/20101118020511/http://veritas.maximilianeum.ch/bitcoin/irc/logs/2010/11/14#l1150 and continued here: https://web.archive.org/web/20101118033208/http://veritas.maximilianeum.ch/bitcoin/ir...

Good job, looks very cool. The namecoin logo you were asking about was created by ninjarobot. A high-res version is available here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File: ... n_Logo.png

To fix the first line (I can't seem to edit it)- Any method of contesting ownership of a domain introduces a method of censorship.

Any method of contesting ownership or auctioning domain introduces a method of censorship. This fundamentally breaks namecoin. I'd rather see domain costs increased to reduce speculation or namespace expanded to other TLD's - and perhaps all names at initial registration are auctioned off as previou...

Problem solved. (fingers crossed)