Search found 255 matches

by moa
Tue Oct 01, 2013 7:46 pm
Forum: Project direction
Topic: Rebasing namecoin on bitcoin 0.8
Replies: 33
Views: 7766

Re: Rebasing namecoin on bitcoin 0.8

Ok, here's the pull request https://github.com/namecoin/namecoin/pull/30 It is in doublec's repo, branch "add-namecoin-qt". https://github.com/doublec/namecoin/tree/add-namecoin-qt I strongly suggest that khal now merges this ASAP and devs start using/testing this as much as possible ... and we reb...
by moa
Tue Oct 01, 2013 7:41 am
Forum: Project direction
Topic: Rebasing namecoin on bitcoin 0.8
Replies: 33
Views: 7766

Re: Rebasing namecoin on bitcoin 0.8

Ok, here's the pull request https://github.com/namecoin/namecoin/pull/30 It is in doublec's repo, branch "add-namecoin-qt". https://github.com/doublec/namecoin/tree/add-namecoin-qt I strongly suggest that khal now merges this ASAP and devs start using/testing this as much as possible ... and we reba...
by moa
Mon Sep 30, 2013 10:21 pm
Forum: Project direction
Topic: Rebasing namecoin on bitcoin 0.8
Replies: 33
Views: 7766

Re: Rebasing namecoin on bitcoin 0.8

Just so everyone is aware today doublec and I are going to be trying to rebase the latest namecoin-qt branch (0.3.70) on top of the current (0.3.51) namecoin in the main namecoin/namecoin github. So if khal will accept that commit and merge it then people can carry on with rebasing the what will be ...
by moa
Wed Sep 25, 2013 3:16 am
Forum: Project direction
Topic: What next? [Namecoin Roadmap]
Replies: 38
Views: 11678

Re: What next?

Everytime you add new code it gets more and more difficult to rebase ... (I've said all this before). If you are wanting to create a new fork that is going to go off and doing its own thing then keep going in this direction, but you should be honest with yourselves that this is what you are doing .....
by moa
Mon Sep 23, 2013 11:08 pm
Forum: Project direction
Topic: New size of the value field
Replies: 42
Views: 6711

Re: New size of the value field

jdbtracker wrote:
moa wrote:We have bigger problems than going off on a tangent with value field size changes .... e.g. rebasing on bitcoin is one big reason.
what are the problems, what needs to be fixed in your opinion?
e.g. rebasing on bitcoin is one big reason.
by moa
Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:58 pm
Forum: Project direction
Topic: Testnet
Replies: 3
Views: 1103

Re: Testnet

Yes, it sounds like the testnet needs difficulty resetting.
by moa
Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:57 pm
Forum: Project direction
Topic: New size of the value field
Replies: 42
Views: 6711

Re: New size of the value field

We have bigger problems than going off on a tangent with value field size changes .... e.g. rebasing on bitcoin is one big reason.
by moa
Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:56 pm
Forum: Project direction
Topic: What next? [Namecoin Roadmap]
Replies: 38
Views: 11678

Re: What next?

What next?!

Upgrade/rebase on bitcoin isn't enough for you already?
by moa
Sun Sep 15, 2013 12:35 am
Forum: Project direction
Topic: [Proposal] Changes to TLS spec + Enforcement of TLS for http
Replies: 21
Views: 8919

Re: [Proposal] Changes to TLS spec + Enforcement of TLS for

Excellent idea. Following the DANE spec will also allow easy comparison between DNSSEC and NMCSEC wherever it gets implemented in other external applications (e.g. gnutls, etc)
... and obviously no need to re-invent the wheel.

Good work.
by moa
Sun Sep 08, 2013 5:35 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: [3 BTC Bounty] TLS Support for .bit Domains
Replies: 73
Views: 22791

Re: [3 BTC Bounty] TLS Support for .bit Domains

http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/23648/what-alternatives-are-there-to-the-existing-certificate-authority-system-for-ssl "what-alternatives-are-there-to-the-existing-certificate-authority-system-for-ssl" Security stack exchange. Given recent revelations about NSA/GCHQ illegal spying and h...