Search found 948 matches

by domob
Sat Jul 02, 2016 4:37 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: when I buy a .bit using namecoin, who gets the nmc ?
Replies: 1
Views: 1545

Re: when I buy a .bit using namecoin, who gets the nmc ?

Technically, the coins are "locked" in your name, but there is no way to get them ever "out" again - so yes, they are burnt.
by domob
Wed Jun 01, 2016 11:22 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Need Namecoin's correct genesishash and other info to run it
Replies: 2
Views: 1945

Re: Need Namecoin's correct genesishash and other info to ru

I've not checked the values, partly because I'm not 100% sure what they should be for Iguana, but all of that information should be in the code: https://github.com/namecoin/namecoin-co ... params.cpp
by domob
Sat May 28, 2016 8:07 am
Forum: Project direction
Topic: Concerns about removing BDB lock limit
Replies: 11
Views: 4375

Re: Concerns about removing BDB lock limit

Another issue occurs to me here. The BDB lock limit checks for the Namecoin transaction version. This behavior changes in the AlwaysAuxpowActive hardfork because the Namecoin transaction version is no longer required. It's unclear to me how to deal with that for the purposes of the BDB lock limit. ...
by domob
Tue May 24, 2016 3:39 pm
Forum: Project direction
Topic: Concerns about removing BDB lock limit
Replies: 11
Views: 4375

Re: Concerns about removing BDB lock limit

My concern is just that the BDB lock limit is actually a very hackish thing, especially when viewed as a limit to the block size. Thus it would be much nicer to get rid of it and, if necessary, set an explicit limit (e. g. at the value that the lock limit "articifically" enforces). But let's see wha...
by domob
Mon May 23, 2016 5:37 pm
Forum: Project direction
Topic: Concerns about removing BDB lock limit
Replies: 11
Views: 4375

Re: Concerns about removing BDB lock limit

If there are serious concerns about removing the limit, then we can of course not do it for now. However, my feeling is that it is not necessary to have it. Until you get some dependable modelling, I wouldn't really believe that the current limit is just good while the full blocksize limit is too la...
by domob
Mon May 16, 2016 9:11 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: #namecoin-meeting Recap/Notes
Replies: 26
Views: 16281

Re: #namecoin-meeting Recap/Notes

Let me just give a quick heads up on the Travis issue(s): I'm not sure what exactly Travis runs, but from my own experience (only on GNU/Linux, of course) the regression tests should "mostly" work now after fixing the BIP9-related test. The only thing that I'm aware of is that "p2p-fullblocktest.py"...
by domob
Fri Apr 29, 2016 5:02 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: ATTN: Jekyll being deployed in 1 week unless NACKs received
Replies: 1
Views: 1340

Re: ATTN: Jekyll being deployed in 1 week unless NACKs recei

ACK from me, but I've only taken a very brief look.
by domob
Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:06 pm
Forum: Identity / NamecoinID
Topic: NameID down?
Replies: 1
Views: 5703

Re: NameID down?

It was, back up. Nothing to worry about, the server just failed to restart due to a misconfiguration after the hoster restarted the VPS.
by domob
Tue Mar 29, 2016 3:58 pm
Forum: Project direction
Topic: Hardfork Wishlist
Replies: 15
Views: 4507

Re: Hardfork Wishlist

So how about consensus for increasing the domain registration length to 1 year? and the size to 1kb? Does anyone still oppose that ? It's a compromise... I (weakly) oppose those changes, as I think we should only do completely uncontroversial changes in this "kind-of-emergency" hard fork. Political...
by domob
Sat Mar 26, 2016 7:37 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Negative balance on default account
Replies: 1
Views: 2480

Re: Negative balance on default account

I do not know exactly how accounting is handled for name transactions, but if you want to fix that, just use "namecoind move JZA '' 0.03787348".