Search found 948 matches

by domob
Wed Oct 17, 2018 4:37 am
Forum: Domain Names / Dot-Bit
Topic: New Registered names dissappearing
Replies: 3
Views: 607

Re: New Registered names dissappearing

Ok, I'm glad it worked out fine for you. My guess is that you did the name_new but the name_firstupdate somehow failed; perhaps that is related somehow to encrypting your wallet. Anyway, in case this happens again and/or you have more information to debug the problem, please open a Github issue so w...
by domob
Tue Oct 16, 2018 2:23 pm
Forum: Domain Names / Dot-Bit
Topic: New Registered names dissappearing
Replies: 3
Views: 607

Re: New Registered names dissappearing

I suggest that you open an issue on https://github.com/namecoin/namecoin-core to debug this. First of all, can you disclose which names you registered and what the txid's are? If you are not comfortable with sharing this information publicly, you can also send to me or someone else you trust private...
by domob
Fri Aug 31, 2018 6:12 am
Forum: Project direction
Topic: An interesting use case for the Namecoin .bit domains
Replies: 6
Views: 1859

Re: An interesting use case for the Namecoin .bit domains

Sure, if you think it would be interesting to try it out "in the wild" with a fork (i.e. new coin you create), feel free to give it a go. Perhaps you can even utilise the Xaya platform (https://xaya.io/) that veterans from the Huntercoin experiment (including me) are currently building - that will m...
by domob
Thu Aug 30, 2018 5:32 am
Forum: Project direction
Topic: An interesting use case for the Namecoin .bit domains
Replies: 6
Views: 1859

Re: An interesting use case for the Namecoin .bit domains

I'm fully in favour of finding more innovative uses for Namecoin - however, as Jeremy said, I do not think "recovering lost keys" is a good such usecase. In fact, I don't even agree that lost coins are a problem in the first place. There have been countless discussions on Bitcointalk about this as w...
by domob
Tue Jun 26, 2018 9:23 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Facebook Page
Replies: 4
Views: 1654

Re: Facebook Page

Sorry for the delay ... I think it is fine for me to take it over. How exactly does the process work? Do I have to request that or can you just do it?
by domob
Mon Jun 18, 2018 7:13 am
Forum: Mining
Topic: Contact with Namecoin miners
Replies: 8
Views: 8760

Re: Contact with Namecoin miners

Thanks, that is very helpful! I can try to look for contacts with the top pools directly then.
by domob
Mon Jun 11, 2018 8:39 am
Forum: Mining
Topic: Contact with Namecoin miners
Replies: 8
Views: 8760

Contact with Namecoin miners

I would like to build contacts with Namecoin miners. This will be useful in the future both to answer some questions about mining-related features I might have (since I'm not a miner) and also for possible future forks. So if you are mining Namecoin and willing to get in touch with me, please reply ...
by domob
Wed Jun 06, 2018 10:44 am
Forum: Project direction
Topic: WDYT about soft fork to enable some Bitcoin features
Replies: 6
Views: 1755

Re: WDYT about soft fork to enable some Bitcoin features

For P2SH, we already have a regtest since a long time ago - name_multisig.py. I don't recall off-hand what exactly it verifies, but names certainly do work with P2SH (feel free to take a look yourself at the test to see if there's anything more you'd like to test). Segwit should work as well from lo...
by domob
Mon Jun 04, 2018 8:47 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Facebook Page
Replies: 4
Views: 1654

Re: Facebook Page

I do have a Facebook account, although I only log in every couple of months (and use it mostly so others can find me and my email address if they want to get in touch). But if it helps and doesn't require me to actively log in more often, I can certainly be admin.
by domob
Mon Apr 23, 2018 5:17 pm
Forum: Project direction
Topic: WDYT about soft fork to enable some Bitcoin features
Replies: 6
Views: 1755

Re: WDYT about soft fork to enable some Bitcoin features

Yes, I agree, we should have support not only by miners (but those are definitely a technical hard requirement for any soft fork). Perhaps also Cassini has some insight, he did some analysis on the network in the past, IIRC. Doing what you describe (shifting the version bits like Viacoin) is certain...