Looks like it wasn't tagged. You can use 'git tag' to get a list of tags btw.cosurgi wrote:[
EDIT: Hmm.... nc0.3.24.54-rc4 seems to not exist at all! Look:
Search found 149 matches
- Tue Aug 09, 2011 10:17 pm
- Forum: Project direction
- Topic: Merged mining + timetravel fix @19200 - must upgrade
- Replies: 156
- Views: 196258
Re: Merged mining block number
- Tue Aug 09, 2011 9:37 pm
- Forum: Project direction
- Topic: Testnet Merged Mining Block Number
- Replies: 45
- Views: 172383
Re: Testnet Merged Mining Block Number
I have version nc0.3.24.54-rc4 up. This version fixes an exploitable bug where the same work can be used to submit multiple auxiliary blocks, by adding multiple auxiliary trees to the parent coinbase. This version only allows one auxiliary chain tree. Someone should ask luke-jr if this is the bug h...
- Tue Aug 09, 2011 4:59 am
- Forum: Marketplace
- Topic: Looking to buy 15,000 NameCoin (NMC)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4973
Re: Looking to buy 15,000 NameCoin (NMC)
I'll sell 15,000 NMC for 0.038 BTC per NMC.
- Mon Aug 08, 2011 11:02 pm
- Forum: Mining
- Topic: [ALPHA.masterpool.eu] Merged Mining Test Server - TESTNET!
- Replies: 44
- Views: 102567
Re: [ALPHA.masterpool.eu] Merged Mining Test Server - TESTNE
If you upgrade your old client, will the BTC or NMC on pre-block chain split be valid to transfer, or are all the previously generated coins simply lost to the new set of multi-chain miners? All NMC on the pre-block chain will still be valid. That's why the block number is coded in the client. To e...
- Mon Aug 08, 2011 3:35 am
- Forum: Project direction
- Topic: Testnet Merged Mining Block Number
- Replies: 45
- Views: 172383
Re: Testnet Merged Mining Block Number
I have version nc0.3.24.54-rc4 up. This version fixes an exploitable bug where the same work can be used to submit multiple auxiliary blocks, by adding multiple auxiliary trees to the parent coinbase. This version only allows one auxiliary chain tree. Someone should ask luke-jr if this is the bug h...
- Sun Aug 07, 2011 4:16 am
- Forum: Mining
- Topic: [ALPHA.masterpool.eu] Merged Mining Test Server - TESTNET!
- Replies: 44
- Views: 102567
Re: [ALPHA.masterpool.eu] Merged Mining Test Server - TESTNE
Just wondering, what difference does it make when selecting what block to start merged mining on? it splits the block chain on that block number. So anyone with old clients, and mining with old clients, will be on the old chain from that number. Any new coins they generate will not be valid on the ...
- Thu Aug 04, 2011 5:14 am
- Forum: Project direction
- Topic: Merged mining + timetravel fix @19200 - must upgrade
- Replies: 156
- Views: 196258
Re: Merged mining block number
So luke-jr who runs the Eligius bitcoin pool claims that there is a security exploit in the merged mining code: 17:02 < luke-jr> bliket_: will you still like me if I exploit the security hole in merged mining? <.< ... 17:06 < doublec> luke-jr: have you notified vinced of what you think the security ...
- Wed Aug 03, 2011 2:54 am
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Sent namecoins to non-existent address...
- Replies: 22
- Views: 17176
Re: Sent namecoins to non-existent address...
Thanks, funds recovered and are in your account.Zimtower wrote:Resent.
- Tue Aug 02, 2011 2:27 pm
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Sent namecoins to non-existent address...
- Replies: 22
- Views: 17176
Re: Sent namecoins to non-existent address...
I haven't received it.Zimtower wrote:I sent you an email for the same issue as OP.
- Sun Jul 31, 2011 12:13 pm
- Forum: Mining
- Topic: [ATT: POOL OPS] PoolServerJ - scalable java pool backend
- Replies: 20
- Views: 24217
Re: [ATT: POOL OPS] PoolServerJ - scalable java pool backend
Oh I see what you mean now... Blkmond function is integrated. It just uses getblockcount requests to the daemons. A polling approach unfortunately but couldn't work out a push method. It allows a max of 1 second between polls per daemon so with multiple daemons you shouldn't see much delay. Is ther...