Search found 14 matches
- Sat Dec 28, 2013 5:06 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Why d/yourname vs b/ or g/ or c/ of p/
- Replies: 18
- Views: 14842
Re: Why d/yourname vs b/ or g/ or c/ of p/
So then you say why not just squat everything a/google b/google <-- (this is google.bit, it is valuable) c/google d/google e/google f/google etc
- Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:57 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Why d/yourname vs b/ or g/ or c/ of p/
- Replies: 18
- Views: 14842
Re: Why d/yourname vs b/ or g/ or c/ of p/
and then since be know "d/google" is valuable we assume "a/google" will also be valuable... (in case something comes along where we use "a/"
- Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:54 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Why d/yourname vs b/ or g/ or c/ of p/
- Replies: 18
- Views: 14842
Re: Why d/yourname vs b/ or g/ or c/ of p/
Im thinking in terms of value of the ledger and ability to "create folders?"? sort of speak.
I guess my question is would it make sense to squat "c/" or "a/" even though right now we only use "d/" for (domains)
I guess my question is would it make sense to squat "c/" or "a/" even though right now we only use "d/" for (domains)
- Sat Dec 28, 2013 3:57 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Why d/yourname vs b/ or g/ or c/ of p/
- Replies: 18
- Views: 14842
Why d/yourname vs b/ or g/ or c/ of p/
Whats stopping someone from squatting those root entrys for future use on a public ledger . Not sure if I make sense. For example, Google wants to do something within the blockchain wouldnt they just lock down google/google then go from there? Not talking about domain name registering here which wou...