==cut==
doesnt work
Search found 10 matches
- Fri Feb 03, 2012 6:32 pm
- Forum: Project direction
- Topic: A lot of coins are lost, it should be changed
- Replies: 44
- Views: 46769
- Fri Feb 03, 2012 6:25 pm
- Forum: Project direction
- Topic: A lot of coins are lost, it should be changed
- Replies: 44
- Views: 46769
Re: A lot of coins are lost, it should be changed
I am happy that someone replied ))) The problems: 1. Coins are destroyed (subj). I am silent about this phenomenom itself. But miners verify the domain transactions and they must be interested in this process, so they must be rewarded. Coins must go to miners, but following tricky way to avoid infla...
- Fri Feb 03, 2012 3:59 pm
- Forum: Project direction
- Topic: A lot of coins are lost, it should be changed
- Replies: 44
- Views: 46769
Re: A lot of coins are lost, it should be changed
==cut==
doesnt work. bounty price decreased, so domain proce decreasing to Zero too. need improvement
doesnt work. bounty price decreased, so domain proce decreasing to Zero too. need improvement
- Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:19 am
- Forum: Project direction
- Topic: A lot of coins are lost, it should be changed
- Replies: 44
- Views: 46769
Re: A lot of coins are lost, it should be changed
Figure above is vulnerable to name registration DoS, which can spike difficulty.
May be need to separate emission/transaction namecoin mining and domain oprations mining.
May be need to separate emission/transaction namecoin mining and domain oprations mining.
- Thu Feb 02, 2012 6:37 pm
- Forum: Project direction
- Topic: A lot of coins are lost, it should be changed
- Replies: 44
- Views: 46769
Re: A lot of coins are lost, it should be changed
I am disagree. Reposting my message here: Okay. Let my chaotic mind continue to travel from critic station to the solution proposal station. How bitcoin deals with increasing bounty hunters? It has a positive feedback between network power and work difficulty. I.e. number of people (actually their c...
- Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:56 am
- Forum: Project direction
- Topic: A lot of coins are lost, it should be changed
- Replies: 44
- Views: 46769
Re: A lot of coins are lost, it should be changed
There is an evil squater which has 1Ghash/s mining power. With a difficulty 518525.94130231 he will get 1.94 NMC per day. Day left, he mined 1.94 NMC and bought 194 domains. If you pass that 1.94 NMC as reward for block solving, his total daily revenue will be increased by 1.94*(his_power/network_po...
- Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:31 am
- Forum: Project direction
- Topic: A lot of coins are lost, it should be changed
- Replies: 44
- Views: 46769
Re: A lot of coins are lost, it should be changed
If miners get the fee it means miners can register names for free. So any miner mining blocks will just fill them up with their own names and get the fees back. Well, then turn off mining to do not let them earn and buy domains... I confused, where is the logic? They mine - they are able to spend m...
- Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:53 am
- Forum: Project direction
- Topic: A lot of coins are lost, it should be changed
- Replies: 44
- Views: 46769
Re: A lot of coins are lost, it should be changed
Waiting will not change that problem. You pay 5, you get back your 5 in next block => still free. Squatter's paradise ! (see below :p) It would be more difficult to do that... And worst, you can just reserve any name you can with your namecoins (just spend 1000$ ?) and sell some of them at high pri...
- Mon Jan 30, 2012 8:28 am
- Forum: Project direction
- Topic: NameCoin as an I2P name service
- Replies: 6
- Views: 11588
- Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:41 am
- Forum: Project direction
- Topic: NameCoin as an I2P name service
- Replies: 6
- Views: 11588
Re: NameCoin as an I2P name service
This is what im talking about
I implemented some basic beta support for .bit domains in i2p
http://i2psupport.org/
I implemented some basic beta support for .bit domains in i2p
http://i2psupport.org/