Search found 26 matches
- Tue Nov 08, 2011 6:01 am
- Forum: Mining
- Topic: [ANNOUNCE] Poolserverj WORKMAKER EDITION RELEASED - 0.4.0rc1
- Replies: 0
- Views: 30066
[ANNOUNCE] Poolserverj WORKMAKER EDITION RELEASED - 0.4.0rc1
Or as I call it: Merged-Mining-in-a-Box :) I'm pretty excited about this release. It contains some very significant new features and improves overall performance by several 100%. The merged mining branch of poolserverj has been in alpha for some time and with the help and testing from several pool ...
- Mon Sep 26, 2011 11:34 am
- Forum: Mining
- Topic: [ATT: POOL OPS] PoolServerJ - scalable java pool backend
- Replies: 20
- Views: 23139
0.3.0.FINAL Released
Changelog: [0.3.0.FINAL] - partial implementation of worker cache preloading. This is not active yet. - fix: stop checking if continuation state is initial. It can be if a previous Jetty filter has suspended/resumed the request. In that case it immediately sends and empty LP response. This might be ...
- Sat Sep 24, 2011 1:40 pm
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Questions for Vinced about merged mining proxy
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5602
Re: Questions for Vinced about merged mining proxy
I'm going to answer some of these now and some later. We don't know the parent block hash yet. The parent block is what we are trying to find by mining. The ordering of chains is by a pseudo-random generator. I've explained why in another post. Since then someone came up with a better solution whic...
- Wed Sep 21, 2011 1:18 pm
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Let's build some merged mining pools!
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8142
Re: Let's build some merged mining pools!
I've taken the previous question and a few others to this thread: http://dot-bit.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=316
I think perhaps the guts of mm proxy is probably not the focus of this thread...
I think perhaps the guts of mm proxy is probably not the focus of this thread...
- Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:08 pm
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Questions for Vinced about merged mining proxy
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5602
Questions for Vinced about merged mining proxy
I've spent the last couple of days going through all sorts of mental contortions trying to decipher the backend of merged mining. I'm finally getting a handle on it (in no small part thanks to ArtForz). I'm particularly cranky today because all the diagrams I drew trying to make sense of it I've jus...
- Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:39 am
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Let's build some merged mining pools!
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8142
Re: Let's build some merged mining pools!
When the mm proxy is preparing the aux root it has to call buildmerkletree on the parent daemon. The doco for this is very sparse and it isn't clear of this should include the hash from the parent chain or not? if I try it without... e.g. namecoind-mm getauxblock { "target" : "0000000000000000000000...
- Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:39 am
- Forum: Mining
- Topic: [ATT: POOL OPS] PoolServerJ - scalable java pool backend
- Replies: 20
- Views: 23139
0.3.0rc1 Released now under GPL license
This is a major milestone release for PoolServerJ. Many of fixes and improvements were as a result of an extensive stress testing process by BTC Guild while they were migrating the pool over. To celebrate I've changed to license to fully open source. Notable changes include: * Now licensed under GPL...
- Sat Aug 27, 2011 4:18 am
- Forum: Mining
- Topic: [ATT: POOL OPS] PoolServerJ - scalable java pool backend
- Replies: 20
- Views: 23139
Re: [ATT: POOL OPS] PoolServerJ - scalable java pool backend
It appears the last critical update introduced a new bug which if triggered causes a memory leak due the cache flushing thread crashing. If you're using 0.2.8 upgrade is urgently recommended. [0.2.9] - fix: FastEqualsSolution not serializable causing exception dumping workmap during safe restart - f...
- Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:24 am
- Forum: Mining
- Topic: [ATT: POOL OPS] PoolServerJ - scalable java pool backend
- Replies: 20
- Views: 23139
Re: [ATT: POOL OPS] PoolServerJ - scalable java pool backend
This release contains some fix's and updates essential for anyone running a live pool. Please read the changelog for details. [0.2.8] - implement 'include' in properties to allow seperation of config blocks into different files for easy changeover - add check for duplicate solution on submit - chang...
- Fri Aug 19, 2011 12:31 pm
- Forum: Mining
- Topic: [ATT: POOL OPS] PoolServerJ - scalable java pool backend
- Replies: 20
- Views: 23139
Re: [ATT: POOL OPS] PoolServerJ - scalable java pool backend
BTW just noticed you've got usePushPoolCompatibleFormat=false
that means our_result and upstream_result will be set as boolean (or 1,0). Not as 'Y' or 'N' that pushpool uses. If those columns are wrong type this could also cause a problem.
that means our_result and upstream_result will be set as boolean (or 1,0). Not as 'Y' or 'N' that pushpool uses. If those columns are wrong type this could also cause a problem.