Search found 707 matches
- Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:10 pm
- Forum: Important Announcements
- Topic: Testnet hardfork on March 15 2014 - release candidate 1
- Replies: 0
- Views: 27147
Testnet hardfork on March 15 2014 - release candidate 1
To allow a better use of the test network, namecoin has been added support for difficulty retarget after 20mn. Here is the message from the bitcoin commit when this feature has been added : Allow mining of min-difficulty blocks if 20 minutes have gone by without mining a regular-difficulty block. No...
- Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:00 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Crytical crypto bug in Linux
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3291
Re: Crytical crypto bug in Linux
From http://www.coindesk.com/serious-linux-flaw-leave-bitcoiners-vulnerable-eavesdropping/ : Explained Garzik: “The gnuTLS bug is pretty bad, but very few use gnuTLS in the bitcoin community. OpenSSL is standard.” Garzik indicated that the use of OpenSSL mitigates a fork risk that is present when us...
- Wed Mar 05, 2014 2:31 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Revocation
- Replies: 17
- Views: 13108
Re: Revocation
I assume P2SH is capable of implementing anyone-can-renew, but I'm not 100% sure on this. That would indeed be a good way to implement anyone-can-renew. Here is a short explain how bitcoin/namecoin works (correct me if I'm wrong, I've some difficulties with scripts & p2sh :p) : - every tx output is...
- Wed Mar 05, 2014 12:41 pm
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: People are having trouble signing up on this board
- Replies: 14
- Views: 11963
Re: People are having trouble signing up on this board
Thanks for the feedbackantimatter wrote:I can confirm the fix. I'm here!biolizard89 wrote:@indolering, can you confirm whether the e-mails are showing up now for your friend?
Thank you @indolering for responding to my email shot in the dark.
ps : old mails are lost forever.
- Wed Mar 05, 2014 12:56 am
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Problem with namecoin.info certificate [SSL, https]
- Replies: 18
- Views: 15091
Re: Problem with namecoin.info certificate
I just changed the certificate to a more valid one, but self signed (the one for srv0.eu was expired). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 SHA1 Fingerprint=14:7D:31:8D:52:CD:43:61:32:91:F1:81:1B:C5:B9:CB:7B:25:4C:71 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBA...
- Tue Mar 04, 2014 10:37 am
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: People are having trouble signing up on this board
- Replies: 14
- Views: 11963
Re: People are having trouble signing up on this board
There was a problem with the mail server configuration, it is now fixed.
- Tue Mar 04, 2014 10:15 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Revocation
- Replies: 17
- Views: 13108
Re: Revocation
Yep, I like the anyone-can-renew idea too (it probably would have saved WikiLeaks' and Pirate Bay's asses), but I think it should be optional (probably enabled by default). Some people may want their domain to expire. And yes, multisig is definitely a good idea. Anyone-can-renew is a good idea. Hav...
- Mon Mar 03, 2014 7:05 pm
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Problem with freespeechme on linux
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5435
Re: Problem with freespeechme on linux
I've pushed a patch here :
https://github.com/namecoin/nmcontrol/pull/14
I hope every most distribution are using "python2" as binary name :p
https://github.com/namecoin/nmcontrol/pull/14
I hope every most distribution are using "python2" as binary name :p
- Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:18 pm
- Forum: Bounties
- Topic: Google Summer of Code
- Replies: 48
- Views: 40158
Re: Google Summer of Code
Thank for the report biolizard89.
Good new :p.domob wrote:Thanks for being there, sounds really good! I volunteer to do it next year again.
- Mon Mar 03, 2014 11:15 am
- Forum: Official Namecoin softwares
- Topic: Repository push procedure
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4920
Re: Repository push procedure
Github provides us an easy way to manage pull requests from people not having the right to push/merge to the repo. As a consequence, we do not need a lot of people to have a push right, while still allowing participation. I'm fine with an ok from another person knowing the code, for non controversia...