Search found 172 matches
- Sun Jul 10, 2011 9:39 am
- Forum: Tools, GUI & other softwares
- Topic: 4 steps to get firefox .bit enabled
- Replies: 24
- Views: 24083
Re: 4 steps to get firefox .bit enabled (Need guinea pigs ^^
Here comes the late shift ;) Guess most of you guys are from US aren't you? Thank you all very much addressing this issues while I'm asleep. I like it if problems get solved while sleeping... :lol: It's really odd. I went for regex as I thought it would be much easier to match TLDs with it correctly...
- Sat Jul 09, 2011 8:58 am
- Forum: Tools, GUI & other softwares
- Topic: 4 steps to get firefox .bit enabled
- Replies: 24
- Views: 24083
Re: 4 steps to get firefox .bit enabled (Need guinea pigs ^^
Fixed the bitcoin site problem by changing the pattern from https?://(.*\.)*bit . [/color]* to https?://(.*\.)*bit / [/color]*. What happens with this regex if you use domains without trailing slash? I. e.: http://example.bit/ vs. http://example.bit I get a warning though when trying to save either...
- Sat Jul 09, 2011 8:47 am
- Forum: Tools, GUI & other softwares
- Topic: 4 steps to get firefox .bit enabled
- Replies: 24
- Views: 24083
Re: 4 steps to get firefox .bit enabled (Need guinea pigs ^^
EDIT: Yeah, the problem was that I had the Basic edition instead of Standard. Problem solved. Well you found a "bug" in the document: Install the Foxy Proxy Basic Extension Open "Tools" → "Add-ons" and search for "Foxy Proxy Standard" :lol: Bit misleading. Changing the document of the Text. We of c...
- Sat Jul 09, 2011 8:38 am
- Forum: Tools, GUI & other softwares
- Topic: 4 steps to get firefox .bit enabled
- Replies: 24
- Views: 24083
Re: 4 steps to get firefox .bit enabled (Need guinea pigs ^^
Tank you for testing this out: Okay, at first test it appears to work. Good work. Haven't tried Tor. Haven't tried Tor either. But the Proxy only allows HTTP and HTTPS connections to Port 80 and 443. You should however be able to use tor to access the proxy. this means any/only .bit DNS queries get ...
- Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:27 am
- Forum: Tools, GUI & other softwares
- Topic: 4 steps to get firefox .bit enabled
- Replies: 24
- Views: 24083
4 steps to get firefox .bit enabled
Hi all, after getting MasterPool up and running I promised to build a public DNS server. However, I recognized there are a lot of .bit enabled nameserver given the fact that only a few people are actively using .bit Domains. For that reason I decided to offer a very easy way to access .bit domains. ...
- Wed Jul 06, 2011 9:22 am
- Forum: Mining
- Topic: [masterpool.eu] DISCONTINUED - shut down at the end of Feb
- Replies: 87
- Views: 276783
Re: [masterpool.eu] 0% Fee - A big thank to all beta testers
I want to thank all beta testers on this pool. For that reason, we introduce a 0% (zero percent) payout fee until the next difficulty change (Have a look at http://dot-bit.org/tools/nextDifficulty.php to see an estimation for the change). Go and grab your namecoins! Of course "new" beta testers are ...
- Tue Jul 05, 2011 1:53 pm
- Forum: Mining
- Topic: [masterpool.eu] DISCONTINUED - shut down at the end of Feb
- Replies: 87
- Views: 276783
Re: [masterpool.eu] New beta stage NMC Pool
Site is now forcing SSL connections.c_k wrote:Suggestion: you need SSL on the website
- Tue Jul 05, 2011 6:05 am
- Forum: Mining
- Topic: [masterpool.eu] DISCONTINUED - shut down at the end of Feb
- Replies: 87
- Views: 276783
Re: [masterpool.eu] New beta stage NMC Pool
For those who want to stay up to date with the pools status it's possible to follow us on twitter as well https://twitter.com/#!/masterpooleu...
- Mon Jul 04, 2011 10:30 pm
- Forum: Mining
- Topic: [masterpool.eu] DISCONTINUED - shut down at the end of Feb
- Replies: 87
- Views: 276783
Re: [masterpool.eu] New beta stage NMC Pool
Yes I agree. Good suggestion. I'll setup SSL ASAP.c_k wrote:Suggestion: you need SSL on the website
- Sat Jun 25, 2011 5:58 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: My concern with the namecoin project
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6074
Re: My concern with the namecoin project
Has anyone thought about this? What sort of measures could be baked into Namecoin so that people aren't incriminating others with the arbitrary data they store on their machines? Have a look here: http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=11381.0 Most (if not all) stuff applies to Namecoin as well.